Board-reported

High-growth national franchise — FP&A through 4x scale

Expanded from roughly 250 to more than 950 locations during the engagement

Function

FP&A buildoutForecasting & planning rigorUnit economics framework

Context

Multi-unit franchiseHypergrowth scale-up

Engagement

Multi-year

The challenge

Hypergrowth was outrunning the financial infrastructure. The FP&A function did not yet exist at the scale the business required. Executives and ownership needed weekly visibility into unit-level economics to guide capital allocation — what existed was too slow, too manual, and too inconsistent to inform decisions at the pace of a 4x growth trajectory. Operations needed labor and pricing tools that aligned with financial targets. Without these, scale would erode margin rather than build it.

How the work unfolded

Week 1–4

Unit-level reporting stood up

Weekly P&L and labor dashboards built for operator use — consistent numbers across the system

Month 2–3

Rolling forecast model introduced

Capital allocation decisions given a financial basis rather than operating on instinct

Ongoing

Finance as operating partner

Pricing, labor, and promotional strategy developed jointly with Operations, Marketing, and Supply Chain

Outcome

EBITDA consistency through 4x growth

250 → 950+ locations. Financial discipline running alongside the scale-up, not behind it

The approach

The FP&A function was built from scratch while the business was already in motion. There was no pause button. Dashboards and models had to be stood up while the team was also running the week-to-week numbers for a business growing faster than its infrastructure.

Weekly unit-level P&L and labor dashboards were the first priority — because without that visibility, every other planning conversation was happening without a shared baseline. The reporting was built to be used by operators, not just read by Finance. That meant simple, consistent, and fast enough to inform decisions before the window closed.

Rolling forecast models and scenario analysis were introduced alongside the reporting. The goal was to give executives and ownership a financial basis for the capital allocation decisions they were already making on instinct. That shift — from instinct to informed — is what holds EBITDA together through a 4x growth trajectory.

Finance operated as a partner to Operations, Marketing, and Supply Chain rather than as a downstream reporter. Pricing, labor, and promotional strategies were developed jointly and tested against the financial model before they went into the field.

At 4x growth, financial discipline is not overhead. It is the thing that keeps the growth from eating itself.

The outcome

The FP&A team was built and reporting infrastructure stood up alongside it. Weekly unit-level P&L and labor dashboards gave the franchise system visibility it had not had before. Rolling forecast models and scenario analysis gave executives and ownership a basis for capital allocation decisions that held up through the highest-growth years. Pricing, labor, and promotional strategies were developed in close partnership with Operations, Marketing, and Supply Chain — Finance as a partner to the business rather than a reporter of its results. EBITDA consistency improved through the scale-up rather than collapsing under it.

Scale

250 → 950+

FP&A function built and held together through 4x location growth

Visibility

Weekly unit P&L

Dashboards used system-wide to improve margin visibility at the operator level

Result

EBITDA consistent

Financial discipline running alongside the growth, not behind it

Working on something similar?

Get in touch